Fred-Rick
2 min readAug 3, 2024

--

Alexandre,

You do realize that you are trying to say two opposite things at the same time. That tells me you have not organized your scientific thoughts appropriately.

Yes: one can say that energy is just a math invariant, but the person declaring this has then mathematical legs standing on mathematical grounds. So, wooden Pinocchio is then not far around.

Then you say, "it is not right to define something physical into something mathematical."

That makes sense to a normal person like me.

--

The best definition for matter you saw is that it is confined electromagnetic waves.

That is totally QM.

Fine, but what is your answer about the rest of reality?

Is your brain really based on God? Are you deep down not standing on scientific grounds, but you are like Penrose standing on grounds of your own making?

I really have a hard time accepting that you have a Ph. D. and then not working in the scientific reality, Alexandre.

You are so fascinated by your goals that your feet are not standing on scientific actualities.

Sorry, buddy. I really like you. I recognize that you are smart. But you are not on the ground in all versions of reality. You are only on the ground in the versions you hand-picked yourself.

Your idea about what matter is is truly incomplete. You have a left chamber functioning inside your brain while leaving the right chamber empty. You know that? Are you aware how one-sided your thinking is (perfect in its own way, but not grasping the entire setting).

No, no intention to insult you. I would love to shake you awake. You are a truly biased scientific individuals. Your brain is a Cyclops of some kind.

--

--

Fred-Rick
Fred-Rick

No responses yet