All I need to say is that the Black Hole model contains a non-scientific reality in that the 'collapsed mass' is not detectable by scientific instruments.

That is therefore a fantastic component of the Black Hole model, Mark.

The Black Eye model does not have that problem. Everything is visible; everything is detected. There is nothing fantastic about the BE model.

The surprise is therefore that physicists haven't discovered the simpler model that does not contain anything fantastic but is fully based on ordinary observations.

--

A Binary Star System has three gravitational centers; one with each star and one collective barycenter. No one embraces the model with an invisible mass in the middle. No one.

A Ten Star System has eleven gravitational centers. No one embraces the model with an invisible mass in the middle.

Why did physicists change models when going from a ten-star system to a galaxy with 100,000,000 stars? All of a sudden there is a mass collapsed onto itself in the center that is not detectable by any scientific instrument.

Why did they change models, Mark?

1. Masses in a galaxy.

2. Gravitational phenomenon.

3. Collapsed invisible mass

Black Hole model explains #2 with #3.

Black Eye model explains #2 with #1.

Occam's razor will prefer the Black Eye model because there isn't anything fantastic as ingredient. Our scientific ingredients can see all objects involved with the outcome. there is no need to accept that matter can collapse onto itself and then becomes invisible to our scientific instruments.

Thank you for your replies. I appreciate them.