And we are in the exact opposite position, David.
If time changed behavior, then measuring time is a worthless endeavor.
Time is not based on any material. It is a measure people established (emphasis on measure, we established the measure). Space (distance) is not based on any material. It is a measure people established.
-
Compare all this to Mercury where we can see the exact same thing happening as what I proposed should be the right side up.
Because of its spatial position close to the Sun, Mercury's precession is different from that of the other planets.
It is the closeness to the Sun that is the reason, yet we have two choices to explain this.
A: The Sun changed the Spacetime reality of Mercury, the gravitational curvature explaining the anomaly.
B: The Solar System as a whole explains the reality of Mercury's precession because Mercury is placed closest to the whirlpool of the Solar System.
A is Einstein's Spacetime, or GR.
B is a mechanical explanation because the Sun is itself not involved in the Solar System's whirlpool, but rather sits in the center of that whirlpool, staying in place due to the abundance of light-weighted materials with heavier materials included in the mix, but hydrogen and helium close to being all mass of the Sun.
Then, the whirlpool itself is wildest in the center (though occupied by the Sun) and second wildest next to the Sun (i.e. where we find Mercury). Further out, the planets behave far more normal.
Same for the Cesium clock.
If the Cesium clock were to be placed far away from Earth's whirlpool effects, then the clock would start ticking more normally again. Yet it is right next to the center of Earth's whirlpool that the Cesium will be affected the most.
No matter which choice you make, David, don't forget that time nor space were the subject matter for Newton or Einstein.
The subject matter was, is, and always will be the behavior of matter. Not the behavior of tools such as time or space.
That's why I provided you the example of the older person measuring less tall than in his youth. The tape measure did not change, the tape measure could never change.
So, when a clock shows something different, then the material the clock is based on changed. And that is why Cesium is so important, because even the most stable mechanism to measure time fails to remain stable when placed in a different spatial setting.
--
Yes, I am challenging Einstein's GR, not because it is wrong but because it is the inverted truth. Like a negative, it is correct.
--
Einstein's GR requires more gravity for a galaxy than what physicists find available.
In my model, there is no issue because the motion that a galaxy is involved in collectively is only partly based on gravity. The First Motion is based on the push (or better: initial retraction) of the materialization process.
--
Thank you for your reply. We find ourselves in opposite places. I claim Einstein created the negative framework, correct in essence, and I present the positive, correct in essence just the same, and adding then some additional predictions.
