And yet this shows well how even scientists can fall for a folly, even collectively so.

Many scientists believe that unification is possible. Many would argue it is only natural.

But it isn't. The scientific data shows that disconnection is the larger setting and connection the smaller setting of the two.

So many scientists hold on to this unification belief, it makes me cringe to think how these smartest of folks are not all that smart.

Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems (Gödel being Einstein's best buddy) show us how no system can be used to climb to the highest position available and then be true and correct throughout for all there is.

Take the word Universe, a falsehood. It implies there is unity at the largest of levels. Uni = 1.

But that 1 here is the decimal 1 only. In the binary system, capable of doing everything the decimal system can also do, there is no 1 representing the universe. It does not exist. We need to agree on, for instance, 11100100 being the same as the whole that is called out as the universe. It is then agreed upon; it is not natural.

Same for the 1 in the decimal system. A long time ago, it was agreed upon to have its specific meaning(s).

The better word is Omniverse because the largest of levels is populated by various systems, none of them the one and only system.

Scientists are people. They can fail to command ordinary logic, and fall into the first rabbit hole they come across.