Au contraire, and that is what I have been trying to tell you, Leon. The egg is not understood by you and you are leaving it intact, which is an impossibility.

Do look closer at what is going on. We say that matter is a result, and as far as I know not a single person in the world denies this. The issue is that the result is subsequently seen as somehow intact on some level by you/by others. The prior state is also no longer intact.

One cannot have a prior state become a new state and that new state then somehow being intact as if nothing fundamental ever happened. There was a break with the past; it must be acknowledged as the first step.

It really does not matter how or what the prior state was to know that we live in the omelet. The egg it came from broke. Anyone thinking there is an intact egg out there follows a flawed structure.

--

It is a similar mistake religious people make. It is not a problem to say that God created creation. But it is a fundamental flaw when God godself did not change/was not changed in that equation.

God cannot have created creation and then remained the same as before. That is an impossibility. It is a brain fart. When brain farts are repeated often enough by many others, then people can think there is nothing wrong with the brain fart.