Bravo, but..., George.

Why are you working with a finite universe?

Who gave you the idea that the universe is a unit of some kind?

Einstein and Newton never said that the universe was a unit.

Spacetime is not the standard of the universe. Spacetime is the tool that explains correctly the behavior of matter.

The tape measure is not the God of Science, it is a (very important) tool for scientists.

Why have physicists gone religious?

Why did physicists turn Einstein's Spacetime upside down and made space and time the essence?

Matter is pretty well investigated by you in this article, and I have no objections to what you are describing. Except....

Remove all the wagging-the-dog language about the universe. There is no sustained relationship between matter and the universe, just like there is no relationship between humans and Life on a far-away planet moving in the opposite direction away from us.

Is that far-away planet made of matter? Yes, it is. But there is no correlation of it with us. The only correlation there is, is a negative one.

The materialization process did indeed take place. The Vase that once existed did indeed get shattered. The pieces do not exist in any relationship with one another, except for the relationship that existed in the past and space as the floor expressing not a shred of any underlying connection among all other than that starting point of the shattering.

Why are you working with a model that is much smaller than reality? Why are you limiting space as if space cannot be infinite?

I do not understand you, George. You must be standing on giants' shoulders, while not realizing their feet are not on solid grounds. I think it is even worse than that: You are standing on giants' shoulders, unable to see their feet, and you are accepting whatever everyone is shouting about these feet as the truth.