Spacetime is not the only option.
Not many people are aware that Albert Einstein’s Spacetime is not the only framework that mathematically explains the anomalies of the universe.
Einstein’s best buddy, Kurt Gödel, envisioned a framework in which space rotates, and it too presents a correct framework to explain the anomalies of the universe.
Before delving into the details, just this fact alone — having a different but correct framework next to Spacetime — undermines the idea that Spacetime is the one and only answer that explains the anomalies of our Newtonian universe.
—
The frameworks that Einstein and Gödel worked out to explain the anomalies are actually not about the universe at all.
The foundation of their frameworks is based on the behavior of matter while moving through space, which is therefore not about the universe but about matter. Let’s quickly undermine the idea that the universe is a unit of some kind.
- To envision the universe as a unit would be akin to saying that the United Nations is a self-based government with far-stretching powers — and we then know this to be true because we know of other self-based governments.
This is an incorrect assumption of course, even though the evidence of self-based governments having power at their own levels is indeed correct. We cannot apply a truth found at one level to another overall level of humans organizing themselves globally.
The same incorrect jump would be to declare the functioning of a star system the same as the functioning of a galaxy. The human mind can make this mistake rather easily, and it is up to us not to fall for lazy conclusions about something absolutely true but then applied to a larger level.
Hopefully this takes care of the false idea some physicists entertain that the universe is a unit. The universe is, rather, a name tag that includes all there is.
Back to Einstein and Gödel because it is important to understand where these smart people started out from.
Obviously, we need to go back to Newton first. Newton was all about matter and about the behavior of matter, including the forces associated with matter. We owe him so much. Now let’s get a grip on matter in the universe.
The largest setting of matter in our universe with a continuous self-based motion is a galaxy. Galaxies come in different sizes, but the largest setting is whichever galaxy is the largest in the universe. The universe itself is not a material setting of self-based motion.
- Naturally, this is the Big Bang model that I am talking about. All matter is moving outwardly from a specific starting area, and when all matter moves apart from one another, then that is not a self-based setting for matter. Rather, it is matter moving in all kinds of separate directions.
The Milky Way is therefore more than just a collective of matter behaving in a circular dance with itself. Our galaxy is also on a very long trip that started with the Big Bang. All that matter of the Milky Way, energy first, matter (and energy) later, all that matter is moving in a singular direction.
- Newton’s First Law of Physics:
An object will remain at rest or continue moving in a straight line at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.
So, with the Big Bang, we have an enormous sent-off push. The force involved with that push is long gone, yet the motion of matter continues in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force.
That means that the Milky Way did not derive from the center of the Big Bang event. The push that all matter in the Milky Way received from the one-time event now 13.8 billion years ago could have only come from a near-perfect horizontal location. This entire collective got pushed in one and the same direction at sent-off.
- Had the Big Bang sent-off not been nearly horizontal for the Milky Way, then the Milky Way could not have existed in the self-based state it currently exists in.
As such, we must entertain the Beach Ball as the model to understand the outcome.
In the center of the Beach Ball, one finds nothing but compressed air. The Beach Ball itself is a layer of plastic.
- The tiniest spot on the skin of the Beach Ball, in essence near perfectly flat so move in as close as you can to that skin, that is the spot from which all energy of the Milky Way derived.
The catapulting action of the one-time event pushed all Milky Way energy in one single direction.
—
I have no idea why Gödel’s work is not known more widely. This mathematician does have quite the following but just in very small circles. It is as if the world could not entertain two Einsteins at the same time.
This article, however, is not about Gödel only. Or just about him and Einstein. It is also about me.
I have a third framework that also explains the anomalies of the universe, something not too complicated to understand.
When two different versions explain the how but not the why, then for certain there will be a third version that explains the how and the why about anomalies seen among the behaviors of matter moving through space.
To explain the third option real quickly in an analogy, it is how the brain and the eyes work together. Humor me.
- The eyes present the brain a view of the world that is upside down. The brain does not like this all too much and ends up ignoring this information. The brain ‘corrects’ the input received through the eyes, so we are experiencing the world as if we are standing on the ground. In reality, we are hanging off the world, our heads pointing to the sky, away from the ground.
Though we are hanging ‘off the ceiling’, with planet Earth then the ceiling, the outcome is of course one and the same as if standing on the ground. Nothing changes in reality, except for the twisted process with the visual input we receive through our eyes.
If you got how there is an extremely subtle layer that is based inside our brain in which we can flip the switch about what is up and what is down, then you will understand the difference between Einstein and Gödel’s frameworks and mine. It is subtle and perhaps unexpected.
- I add the Big Bang push to help explain the outcomes we see with matter, whereas Einstein and Gödel worked just with the motions that are based on gravity.
For certain, the Big Bang event could have only happened through the use of force, though the finer point is that this force got spent, then and there. That force was not a continuous force like gravity is.
The setup is quite simple.
The prior energized state of the universe, first under normal conditions, experienced in the end extreme conditions, and this produced a situation in which (some) energy got warped, got damaged.
In the aftermath, the extreme conditions returned to normal conditions, but then now with the damaged energy included, incapable of returning to how it was before.
- At the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation locations, the conditions had fully returned to normal for the first time since the extreme conditions had occurred, and the damaged energy (now identifiable as quarks) formed neutrons and protons at first opportunity.
The positive charge of the protons caused the negatively-charged electrons to enter the fray as well, binding the immaterial energy to the material energy, forever and ever.
The Milky Way is not the same as all matter in the universe, which means that the immaterial connection to all other energy had to get severed at some point not long after the sent-off.
- The Milky Way is a galaxy of matter and energy.
- We are not connected to anything else in the universe.
—
Let’s do a quick recap, telling the same in a different manner.
Einstein’s framework is about:
Milky Way circulation/Solar System revolutions/Earth spinning
Gödel’s framework is about:
Milky Way circulation/Solar System revolutions/Earth spinning
My framework, called First Motion is about:
Milky Way sent-off/Milky Way circulation/Solar System revolutions/Earth spinning
The interesting reason Einstein and Gödel’s frameworks are correct is because they based their frameworks on active forces only.
The First Motion model contains additionally the on-going motion of the original sent-off of the Big Bang. However, this does not change the forces active at this moment. Einstein and Gödel showed the correct framework, therefore, yet they could not explain the why.
Not three, but FOUR motions are involved in the behavior of matter. And it is the First Motion that Einstein and Gödel did not incorporate in their frameworks that explains the anomalies we see with matter.
—
Einstein and Gödel understood there had to be an additional framework to explain the anomalies seen among the behavior of matter moving through space. They got the right calculations; they got the right outcomes.
Yet they pinned it on space or on spacetime. They did not consider how anomalies seen among the behavior of matter should be pinned on the behavior of matter itself.
Einstein and Gödel did not envision the spent force of the Big Bang event that pushed all known matter to continue moving in a straight line at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an additional force.
