Fred-Rick
2 min readOct 3, 2021

--

Fact: Energy does not get lost.

Fact: Matter came into existence some 13.8 billion years ago.

Theory: Energy, Time and Space came into existence when Matter came into existence.

To prove the theory incorrect: If energy does not get lost, then we cannot find the origin for energy.

Placing the origin of energy at the same time as the origin of matter is then a scientific faux pas because there are no arguments to place all events occurring at the same moment when we just know that one of them happened.

-- One cannot have men be created in the image of God, and then have God be a Cyclops. That is not how it works and the brain should not make that mistake.

If we start out with energy that does not get lost, then we can declare this with 1. If we declare matter to be transformed energy, then we can still declare the total with that same 1, while acknowledging it underwent transformation in a process.

1 + x = 1 in which x is the transformation that keeps both 1s the same in light of energy, but that has the second 1 contain matter as transformed energy as well.

Naturally, x will be 0, but this 0 must be fundamental and not just an empty nothing. A fundamental separation among the first 1 is a good description of that 0. It means that the original 1 was somehow capable of producing a fundamental separation among this energized state.

That leads to our living in a universe in which two realities exist (God has two eyes, is not a Cyclops).

Instead of our current universe being one closed system in light of energy, our universe is two closed systems (not violating any laws).

https://fred-rick.medium.com/two-closed-systems-not-one-3d66da5b8dff

"Two closed systems, not one."

Singularity is out, ultimate unification is out. Matter desires to unify, but can only do so at the 'local' levels and not at the universal level. Space is the largest aspect of our universe, and squarely points to a fundamental separation occurring among energy, right before matter came around.

--

--

Fred-Rick
Fred-Rick

No responses yet