Gödel and I already proved the existence of God. But I am not sure if you can read that information correctly.
First, one must separate the word God from the scientific dictionary. God is not found in that dictionary, so it makes no sense to use the word God in a scientific manner.
Instead, we will have to use the word Energy. Please read God every time I use Energy, and then you can see that Energy did indeed exist already.
Before delivering the scientific/mathematical evidence, let me provide a simple description first.
When we have an omelet as result, we automatically know that there was an egg first.
This is what we factually know:
Matter had a beginning.
Matter's flip side is called Energy.
We do not know the beginning of Energy.
We also do not know the beginning of Time or Space.
So, the scientific dictionary is populated with facts plus there are areas that science has no facts about.
We do know that Energy does not get lost, and that means we do not need any extraordinary evidence that Energy already existed before matter was produced.
In fact, we need extraordinary evidence for saying that Energy was created when matter was created. It is a doubled feature that is scientifically of a very low quality. I wouldn’t even call it scientific.
Of far greater quality is to have Energy be the place holder, and focus on the appearance of matter from that Energy. After all, we do have the result, so we know the source was there, too.
--
What evidence did Gödel bring? He brought his Incompleteness Theorems, about 100 years ago. With it, we can read that there is no unification on this side of the material curtain. We see a lot of unification indeed, but not at the universal level. In simple words: three forms of unity do themselves not make a single overall form of unity.
My evidence shows, too, that a fundamental break had to take place before we can discuss matter. Matter is fundamentally distinct, and as such we have to have a break occurring in the prior state (whatever it was) before something fundamentally new could have been established.
The egg cannot transform into the omelet without breaking the egg first. That means there are two processes in place, and not one.
The breaking of the egg had to occur, and the breaking of the egg had to occur in the prior state of the universe. The shell of the egg is not part of the omelet. Creation did not start from nothing, nor did creation result from everything prior. We have to have that fundamental break, and it must have happened before the omelet came about. The material result is from parts of what existed prior.
We don't care to know any exacting details for that prior state because we don't have any exacting details -- except those delivered through the result. Because of the result, we have a prior state. We do not live in the original state of the universe.
So, we do have Energy as the beginning for the beginning of matter. We can't say how Energy itself got started up, just like we have no data at all about the beginning for Space and Time.
It does not matter if we say Energy or God. One makes use of scientific language, the other makes use of religious language. And as we already saw, unification is not real at the universal level, so we do not have to make these two languages one and the same. It would actually be silly to try.
Thank you for your article. I hope you see the human brain can find ways around your blockade in a scientifically satisfying manner.
