Good article and pointing in the direction of one unintentional error that exists in the human mind: an assumed correctness about the other reality. I have just the example for you to bring the point home.

Close an eye and you can see what a Cyclops sees.

This example can show the two views, one correct, one incorrect.

If we just do the viewing, then we can say that we see what a Cyclops sees.

Yet if we believe that the open eye ended up moving toward the center of our face, then that is the fallacy in question.

--

When working on paper, or working in a virtual reality, or following what AI tells us, then a false reality will occur in which our feet are not based on the true reality, but on an artificial reality.

I claim the Black Hole idea is one such artificial conclusion, with an enormous mass shrunk to invisible size hidden behind an event horizon. It's like scientists closed one eye, and then reorganized the remainder around itself. They put the open eye in the middle of their faces. Then, when the gravitational depression of a Black Eye is encountered (no mass in the center), they call it out as evidence for the Black Hole they calculated on paper (with a mass, invisible, hidden behind an event horizon).

Good article. We will stay one step ahead of the machines, as long as we keep our feet based on our reality and not on the artificial reality that includes math.

The human brain is the one to make the final step to understand the reality in which we live.