Gödel already provided the math about 100 years ago.

His Incompleteness Theorems are showing rather obviously that, when we have something like an invisible force, then we will always have two accurate models to explain what we see about the forces.

Naturally, just one model will be correct, but we need to have information about the location itself to know with certainty which model it is.

For the Eye of the Storm, we know that Model B is correct and Model A is incorrect.

Model A: An invisible mass causes the near-by enormous forceful outcomes.

Model B: The collective causes an enormous depression in the center of the collective with its near-by enormous forceful outcomes.

We know that the Eye of the Storm cannot be Model A because we have been inside the Eye of the Storm ourselves. We can light up a Cuban cigar without much problem. There is not even any wind there.

Yet the Wall of the Eye is where the strongest wind gusts ever measured on planet Earth are found. We know with certainty that Model A is incorrect; Model B is correct.

For the center of a galaxy, Model A and Model B are available. We cannot get to the center itself; we observe the forceful outcome from a distance through observing the behavior of matter.

Interestingly, physicists focus on Model A only. That model contains a special aspect that is almost too fantastic to believe: Matter can collapse onto itself so we cannot detect it.

Model A is nevertheless available, but Model B is simpler, smarter. Everything about Model B is already acknowledged in various other settings, just not this specific setting.

Thank you therefore for your reply, SynerGIS Informationsysteme GmbH, because you are very much in the camp of supporting what the leaders of science are saying, ignoring the second model equally available.

I consider it good to think for myself instead of simply accepting what the leaders of science are saying. You? I am not certain. You seem to have made up your mind and you are not open to the other model.