Here's a good and accurate conspiracy: The Founding Fathers worked together to devise a voting system in which only the majority would be represented and all the others would get nothing. They called it We The People to make it go down more easily.
I am only partly kidding. The Founding Fathers did two things at the same time, actually. On the one hand they prevented us from getting twenty little parties in the seats and therefore they provided political stability for the national level of what they knew was going to be an enormously large nation.
And on the other hand they ensured that the government cannot overreach into the lives of the People, because they did indeed empower the People in the US Constitution.
Yet we need to be vigilant. As we have seen with separate-but-equal, State and local governments can put an overreach in place and declare things about people's lives that is truly none of their business.
The Founding Fathers were rightfully afraid of the mob, and they meant the public at large with too many freedoms plus the government being taken over by the mob and their taking too many freedoms.
These folks in governments are still doing it today. The State walks into the local power realm of the People and declares that it is verboten to have the best voting system in place in our cities and counties. The Founding Fathers would have balked at them.
The Bill of Rights does not give the States the power to declare how we must vote in our cities and counties. Rather, it demands that the better voting system is used (per the legal decisions that came out from the separate-but-equal cases).
So, yes, there are conspiracies and they can even appear to be legal. But if we are awake enough to pay attention, then we can push back the State where it has no business conspiring.
Interested? Come join the Local Revolutions grassroots movement. We just got our first article out in a local newspaper of a city that received a Constitutional Invocation:
