I agree that Science is wonderful, and I am glad you show the boundaries of Science.
The Scientific Realm is larger than the Scientific Reach.
The best way to show the limitation of Science is when scientists go where they cannot go, and yet they go with evidence in hand.
I am talking about the materialization process in which, to date, the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation is the oldest scientific fact on the book.
In come additional information and data, from laboratories such as the Large Hadron Collider, that are subsequently placed inside a model that scientists do not know whether it is correct. And yet they go toward a singularity of unknown mathematical properties.
Philosophers have a field day here, because this is basically planted evidence.
Scientists now state (in an analogy) that Rubber Trees grow in Alaska, and as proof they built greenhouses in Alaska and brought rubber plants from Brazil. Yes, they conclude, it is true.
When investigating matter to understand where matter comes from, physicists make a structural mistake. On the one hand all will agree that matter is a result, and on the other hand they look at matter and declare it the essential part to understand the origin.
That is not good logic.
Nothing discovered, or perhaps better to say, nothing much discovered with matter can be used to declare the reason matter came about.
1 + x = 1
In this simple equation, 1 represents the total of energy prior to the CMBR and after the CMBR. The x captures the change.
Low and behold, we can finish this simple equation without a problem.
This x = 0.
Naturally, the zero cannot be a simple unimportant zero. Much like a divorce not eliminating the individuals before or after, the marriage of before changed into the divorce after. The effects of the divorce are not noticeable at the exact moment itself; it is in the aftermath that the divorce finds its lasting results. The two people involved changed.
Notice how physically investigating both separated people would not have told us anything about the divorce. That is the exact point where the Large Hadron Collider information is not the best source to answer the question what happened in the materialization process.
For that, we need to go back to the simple equation and realize that the 0 is found in front of the equal sign, and not after or at the equal sign itself.
The divorce did not appear by itself. It was during the marriage that the divorce was being worked on and ultimately produced.
It was prior to materialization that the fundamental separation was being produced, after which matter was able to come about
That is the exact difference between the Big Bang theory and the Big Whisper theory. In the Big Whisper theory, the fundamental separation occurred at the end of the prior state. It is not incorporated inside the materialization process, but it is the a priori.
The prior state in this case is the state prior to the CMBR. Note, how matter derived from the area prior to the CMBR, and that we do not need to go toward a singularity (like they do in the Big bang theory), just like we do not need to go back to the births of both people that first got married and then got divorced.
