I am asking you to undermine the model, Aaron. I will keep asking you to do that.
Models need not be proven because they are a view on how that what is known fits together. Yet models can be undermined if they are not correct onto themselves. So far, you have not been able to do that.
I do not mind if you have a preference. That is perfectly fine. But you cannot be a football supporter of your own club and not see the qualities of the other team. That is scientifically not professional.
--
I bring further support for you to see the other model.
First, let me reiterate that we have an asymmetrical reality on planet Earth for air pressure. We have a regular high and a regular low of air pressure, but only an extreme low air pressure in the Eye of the Storm. There are no extreme highs, so model-wise we find an asymmetrical outcome.
The reason is of course that our material planet Earth is located on one side viewed from the Storm. Gravity is always on ‘the inside’.
A galaxy is symmetrical, which means we can place the force in the center. We can place the Eye of the force in the center. Nothing is pulling it out-of-the-way.
Materially, for planet Earth, I already showed you how the same model can be applied for the solid inner core and the fluid inner core inside the planet. Same model, but then applied for matter inside a single planet, and then indeed symmetrical.
Further support is found with the shape of planet Earth which is round and how we do not see that with galaxies.
If we review galaxies, then we do not find a perfectly flat outcome, yet compared to the roundness of planet Earth we can declare a galaxy to be flat-ish for sure. This outcome is again symmetrical.
Gravity helps keep the masses together which means that all masses are pulling on all masses in as far as the extent of each gravitational pull per mass is concerned. That explains the ‘flatness’ of galaxies. Gravity is at work throughout, the center the ultimate playing field. The outward pull is made stronger by the circular motion of the galaxy (the second fastest speed for matter in the universe), and gravity helps keeping this collective together.
-
Again, Aaron, I see you rejecting the Black Eye model not because you can't see it, or undermine it, but because you have made up your mind that the Black Hole model is the only one. Your mind decided which model is correct and that the other model must then be incorrect. You pick Adam as the model, and you reject Eve as the alternate model.
I continue to invite you to undermine the Black Eye model and be professional in your assessments and arguments.
You have not succeeded other than declaring how you see the forces behave. You are not bringing evidence to undermine the model.
Thank you for this conversation. I am not expecting further replies from you, but the invitation remains open. If you can undermine the model, you'd be my hero.
