I am having a good time, David. I see a lot of people that think the Black Hole model has been proven mathematically, but it has not.

Models are not based on math; they contain lots of math, which is the entire issue. The Black Hole model is chosen and subsequently lots of math is applied. When asked to do the same for the Black Eye model, many reject that option.

Therefore, they have one eye open, and one eye closed.

I am waiting for folks to open their second eye. Fortunately, some have both eyes open already. I am happy about that.

Had anyone undermined the Black Eye model, then I would have been grateful. Now? No one has undermined the model, so I am still good.

You want a little more:

When viewing a binary star system, there are three gravitational centers: one with each star and the barycenter. The formula is then X + 1. X represents the total of masses.

Of course, no one says there is an invisible mass in the barycenter with a binary star system. Everyone agrees.

When there are ten stars in a system, there are ten masses and eleven gravitational centers.

Most folks will still say there is no invisible mass in the barycenter. Some folks stop communicating because they can't handle the issue in front of them. Their minds stop investigating.

When there are 100,000,000 stars in a galaxy, there is still no invisible mass in the barycenter (using barycenter as the spot where we discover the enormous gravitational outcome, though the exact center is net-zero, the gravitational monster existing around the barycenter and not in the center itself).

All of a sudden, there is an invisible mass in that spot, say almost all physicists.

How physicists go from X + 1 to a surprising X + A instead is the issue. Here, A stands for an invisible mass.

That is my fun, David. Physicists embrace one model with the binary star system and another model with the gravitational monster in the center of a galaxy.

Folks are fighting my model like Don Quichote was fighting windmills. They think I say something weird, but it is actually inside their heads that they are failing to do something properly. They have one eye open and they should have two eyes open (until the final evidence is in).

I do not need to deliver more evidence; they need to open their second eye and see the depth they are currently not seeing.