I am using my brain to recognize structure, including the structures we can see with the help of scientific data. But... no modesty on your part, Clem. You are doing a great job expressing yourself in profound (and very good and funny) manners. You can be proud of your achievements.
--
To recognize that there has to be immaterial energy, the following:
We live in a result, I hope you agree.
That means there are two realms to work with.
A. The realm from which the second realm originated.
B. The current realm.
To end up from realm A to realm B, there are only three options available, and two of them cannot be.
1. Everything from nothing. Some people think that this can be, yet from the Nothing station no trains will ever depart.
2. Everything from a prior everything. This sounds more logical already, but can also not be. When the second distinct 100% is indeed the full 100%, then it will automatically return to the original 100%, undo the distinctions, and do so in a jiffy.
3. Some distinctions from a prior everything. In this case, most of the prior 100% is still just the way it was, but some of the prior everything got transformed (into matter).
Only #3 is possible if we accept that the material universe is 13.8 billion years old. We have the new (matter) but we also have a lot of the old energy (immaterial).
We need a breakage of some kind, and it must be a breakage of the original realm A. It must end up being distinct in a variety of manners.
Only then can realm B be maintained.
That means that the original Vase, to use a silly analogy, broke, and there is no vase any longer. The pieces of the vase are now our reality. Meanwhile, the total of the pieces of the vase is still the same total as when it was intact.
With the known outward motion among all matter, we know that the immaterial aspects must also be moving in separated ways (with matter). All broke into pieces and some parts of the pieces ended up being material.
The electrons are provided by the original immaterial energy fields to counter the positive charge of the protons. This links damaged energy (neutrons and protons) to the immaterial energy fields, via the electrons. The immaterial energy fields are undamaged (still like the original) but broken up (floating apart together with matter).
Ergo, realm A is indeed gone, undermined, but some aspects in realm B are still what they were in realm A. Other parts in realm B are self-based (matter).
--
Clem, you do not need to agree with my assessment. If interested we can discuss details further.
--
With the Now, it is actually the opposite to make the Now go away. Instead of saying that the Now is the only time there was/is/will be, one can also say that the Now is exactly what is missing.
Instead, we have two time aspects then only: the past and the future. Only they are real. And they are solid.
The past and the future do touch each other. It is only in the transmission where both aspects touch each other that we have the ability to move about/make changes. The past and the future do not have any freedoms to offer, except in the exchange.
Clem, this time view is of course not based in science; it is pure philosophical, but a fun way to think about structures. Many folks add past, present and future in one model and have this become a scramble in their minds. By picking just the Now, or picking past and future only, one can play a bit more with time.
Thank you once again for your wonderful article.
