I am using that term to indicate that the foundation underneath my words is (or desires to be) of a structural nature, Paul.

I am using it also because structural thinking is in my mind essential for us humans to understand the bigger picture. I am going to give you an example.

In the decimal system there is a natural emphasis on number 1 as the most important number first in line. So, when we think according to the decimal system, we place extra importance on the leader, the winner, the first, the collective agreement, etcetera.

Contrast this with the binary system in which there are many 1s (and many 0s), and none of the 1s is anywhere near identical to the 1 we use in the decimal system.

To declare a leader, winner, or collective agreement, the binary system would call that out, for instance, as 11011100101001 and then from that moment on it would have that meaning, for those that agree to that meaning.

Both systems contain different structures, and as such they guide the human brain toward certain outcomes. First thing therefore is for the human brain to recognize these structures. Big-picture thinking will be distorted if we do not recognize the placement of our thoughts/data/information in said structures.

I am adding a link to an article describing my thoughts about number 1 as an example, hopefully this is interesting to you:

https://fred-rick.medium.com/the-ambivalence-of-number-1-58cec258452b

This article ends in a political statement, but I am sharing this article more to show that our brain can conjure many things, and that if we don't get the foundation of words right (including their proposed structure) that we can then fail to see the truth as it was meant to be.

Thank you, Paul, for asking about the term.