I can do it. It is actually easy, Modeller.
To see what is going on, you have to be situated at the top level. For instance, if you dive into the decimal system, then you will automatically consider 1 the same as 'unit' or as 'Unity'.
Only when you go look at the binary system do you notice that 1 is not a 'unit' or 'Unity' in that system at all, which should wake up your mind about something special about the decimal system.
It contains many shortcuts. We love the decimal system of course because 365 days in the year is easier to read than our having 101101101 days in the year in the binary version.
--
If we take Black Holes, then the thing to notice is that this was first established on paper, not based on our reality yet. Then, when the phenomenon was discovered, it was declared the Black Hole.
That is like me drawing a Cyclops on paper, and then walking in a dark alley at night seeing one for sure.
A phenomenon is an outcome in which the essence is not on the inside but on the outside. A good example is the Eye of the Storm without any wind in it. That phenomenon is caused by what is occurring all around it. There is no invisible mass inside the Eye of the Storm.
--
Same for the Big Bang model, it desires a centrist aspect that is like the decimal 1. In binary language, the Big Bang model falls apart because there is no moment at all that Unity is part of the process.
Let me show the correct version of baking a cake and then the Big Bang version of baking a cake.
1. Get all the ingredients mixed into a batter
2. Put the batter in the oven
3. Out comes the cake
Here's the Big Bang version:
1. Put all cake particles in the oven
2. Out comes the cake
They missed a step.
--
Spacetime is a framework, and when we look at Newton and Einstein's work, then we know that they were interested in explaining the behavior of matter, for Mercury, for instance.
Never was the universe the subject matter. Never was Space or Time the subject matter. It was always the behavior of matter that was the subject matter.
So, we have the dog and everyone agrees on the dog. Yet the wagging position of the dog is misunderstood. Now we have the dog being wagged instead of the dog wagging its tail.
Einstein was super smart. He realized and then identified what was missing. He had no clue why. He just figured out the framework that was missing.
He did not know that the fastest speed we are involved in is associated with the Milky Way collectively moving into a single direction (away from where it all began, 13.8 billion years ago). He did not have that information, so he could not put that in his model either. It does not matter, because the framework is still the same, but Einstein did not know where to hang his hat, and so he hung it on Spacetime.
--
It is so easy, Modeller, that it is painful how many react to this information with rejection instead of investigation. Of course, I tried getting some of my work published, but there is no scientific paper interested. The single scientific footnote I got was for my self-published book proving that zero is a fundamental number and can have a function.
A scientist is supposed to investigate, and yet what most are doing is reject out of hand.
-
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate it.
