I see, Rex. You are melding two systems into one, and nothing comes to mind why you shouldn't do that.
Since you are continuing to communicate, let me ask you once more if you want to work on Model B. I would really like that. So far, you haven't done that.
Here are some helping points, structurally.
Model A
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etcetera.
Model B
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etcetera.
In both models, 1 represents the gravitational monster. That 1 in Model A is a mass so strong nothing escapes it. That 1 in Model B is the strongest gravitational force with in its center a net-zero spot, indicated with 0.
--
Wind is a force we cannot see, but we do experience it, there is no doubt whether there is wind or not; it’s obvious. When there are clouds present, we can see the wind real well.
The Eye of the Storm is a depression, and in the center there is actually no wind. Then, with the Wall of the Eye we have the strongest wind force ever measured on planet Earth.
Starting from the center of the Eye, the wind force is as follows:
0, 1, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0
0, the absolute minimum, and 1, the absolute maximum, sit right next to one another in the middle of the storm. The center is a depression with its own conditions, but no wind. The Wall is the extreme condition of winds.
When folks declare that the Eye of the Storm controls the hurricane, then that is wagging the dog (so, very few actually say this). The Eye of the Storm is a result of the Storm, it is not the control center of the Storm. A collective created that Eye under special circumstances.
Perhaps you see it now. You say you understood structure from when you were very little. You should then be able to work with this.
I'd really like it if you worked out Model B, but I can't force you. First task for me is to make you see Model B, and so far I am not having much luck.
--
No, I don't smoke. I used to, once a year or so, and while the high was quite interesting I did not like the following days of being depressed, not worth it. I am also a bit too sensitive; it is too strong. As such, it has been years now. Not that I am against it; I may use it when I am retired (hopefully soon), but it does not hold my attention right now.
