I self-published that back in 2000, Frederick.

In it, I showed the evidence that zero is a fundamental number and that zero can also have a function.

I received a single scientific footnote for my work. People were not interested in understanding zero.

In my endeavors I realized that Gödel already proved the same point already, but then in a different way.

His Incompleteness Theorems show that the foundation of our existence is not based on One, cannot be based on One. Starting out with whichever axioms you want to begin with, you can't take that axiom to the top level and have that explain everything about the axiom or have the axioms explain everything.

That is like declaring how the ability to grow a mustache is a human feature but then not being able to bring this to the top level because not all human beings can grow a mustache.

So, the pudding was eaten already. The evidence is out already. God is not a Cyclops. The Big Bang model is not correct, the Black Hole model is not correct, all because they missed the importance of the empty spot.

It's just that scientists who are supposed to have an investigative nature are rejecting my work out of hand. Their first step is to reject.

They come up with one thousand reasons, but in general they point to me and tell me how I do not know my stuff.

It is so irritating. It's like I speak English and they speak French, and though I know that they can speak English well, they refuse to speak English.

So, that's why I am here, communicating with everyone I can communicate with. No one else is listening. No one else seems to be awake.