I understand really well what you are saying. I have no problem following you, Andy. No problem at all. It is super easy what you are saying.

I see clearly that you have no clue what I am saying. You are paying attention to what you know/see. You are not paying attention to what I am saying.

So, that means you have homework to do. I see real clear what you are saying.

--

Let's start out with clocks sent into space, showing us very important information.

There are two options, however, and both are correct until one of them is shown to be incorrect.

Here we go:

Clocks in space show us a different time on their display than clocks left on Earth.

Did these clocks tell us that,

A: Time dilated, or

B: The clocks' matter changed behavior

If we follow Einstein, then both answers are covered by his Spacetime framework.

We have to use our brains to make the decision because there is no scientific option to distinguish between A and B. Nevertheless, both cannot be correct at the same time.

What does your brain say?

Do you agree with Einstein that matter changed behavior when placed in a different spatial position (option B), or...

Do you agree with most physicists that time dilated (option A)?

Note, Andy, that I am with Einstein. He figured it out, and then everyone else started wagging the dog, pointing at time, instead of having the dog wag its tail, pointing at matter. These physicists put their money on time instead of matter. They inverted the scientific model.

Thank you for communicating with me. We can continue if you are willing to investigate what I am saying. I don’t have a problem seeing what you are saying. You are with one option; I am with the other option.