I understand what you are saying, Justin.

The exact thing I am trying to make come across is by pinpointing once more that the majority of voters in Sweden are required for their government to make a majority decision.

That is not the case in the United States.

There is an elimination game going on in the voting booth, here, because up to 49.99% of the voters get nothing. They become the have-nots.

Let's follow the US Senators as the example, and we can then know that about 60% of the voters picked their representative. That means that 30% of the 100% of voters got their Republican Senator, 30% of the 100% of voters got their Democratic Senators, and 40% of the 100% of voters got nothing at all.

The changes established by the next generation are 3/5th changes at best. They are never 5/5th changes.

--

A riot in a prison can indeed change the way the prison is controlled and managed. Worse is changed into better is changed into worse is changed into better. But the doors don't open. The change never includes the opening of the doors as long as the people remain inside the restricted system.

When the Founding Fathers set up the US Constitution, they only had restrictions in mind for the way we elect the Federal level, nowhere else. The States doubled down and put restrictions in place for State elections and tripled down with putting restrictions in place for the local level. That was illegal.

That is illegal because the Founding Fathers did not allow governments to disparage or deny rights held by the People.

We let them take our rights away from us. We have to get our rights back at the State and the local levels (the Federal level will be fine as is once State and local levels have changed).

Good conversation, Justin. Thank you.