If you are a mathematician, then you know for a fact that models are not based on mathematics, SynerGIS Informationssysteme GmbH.
You then know that Gödel showed that even mathematics is an Incompleteness.
--
Let's walk this to two different numerical systems that can be used in mathematics.
We have the decimal system and the binary system. Both systems can appoint anything in the entire universe, numerically.
While they can do the same things, they are not the same.
There is no absolute 0 in the binary system. There is no absolute 1 in the binary system. There are many 1s and 0s in the binary system.
If we want what the decimal system delivers, for instance, with 'unit' or 'unity', then we have to establish that first. It is not automatically present in the binary system.
Take unity. We can declare that 'unity' is expressed with 11100110110001 and as long as we all agree on this sequence to represent 'unity' then we have captured it indeed.
But 'unity' is not automatically present in the binary system. We have to establish it.
The decimal system contains shortcuts that we really like. Unity can be pointed out with 1, no questions asked. If we had had eight fingers, we would have really liked the octal system. We think the shortcuts are absolutely real, and that is not always the case.
--
This means that Gödel was indeed correct. When we desire to explain the big picture, then we bump into an Incompleteness because there isn't anything we can use to establish the truth that is true both at the local level and at the universal level.
So, when we view the center of a galaxy and we discover that there is an tremendous gravitational phenomenon going on, then we must remember Gödel and accept at least two models to explain what we see.
Only when we go there ourselves or send instruments, only then will we know for certain. Until then, we must work with both models.
--
The Eye of the Hurricane does not have an invisible mass in the center. We know this for a fact, so we can throw that model out for the Hurricane. We don't know for a fact what is going on with the Black Hole/Black Eye phenomenon. But we do know the following:
Occam's razor picks the Black Eye model because all is explained without the need to express anything super special like matter collapsing onto itself.
Remember that the Black Eye model does not need to provide evidence that the Black Hole model's essential aspect is incorrect.
