Fred-Rick
3 min readJun 3, 2022

--

I'll try, Jbadge.

What I am pointing out is a function, like an actor.

We associate actions with actors, and we can point at each actor for each of their actions.

Yet there is also something of an action occurring with group behavior that none of the individuals would think of doing when each by themselves. That is then a secondary action viewed from a collective perspective.

Another example is the death penalty in the United States.

Murdering someone is against the law, and yet the death penalty is indeed homicide according to the coroner. We can call both levels homicide while one is against the law and the other is established by the law.

As such, we have two different levels of behavior and when we look at just one level, we cannot explain or justify the behavior occurring at the secondary level.

To use number 0, we can apply 'against the law' as the point of view.

Against the law: 1

Against the law: 0

In the first example, the 1 indicates someone committing murder, while in the second example, the 0 indicates someone being murdered while we would not call it murder but something more like ‘was put to death.’

--

The deeper idea for the materialization process is that a secondary level started to occur where prior there was no secondary level.

If at first there is just energy and not anything materialized, then we can envision this as being of a similar setup throughout.

Because we have an outcome that is different in expression all by itself, we cannot start out with that original something not having had any capabilities at all. Something must have happened in that state to end up with a state containing diverse levels of expression.

Consider for instance a toy that got wound up too much so the winding mechanism broke. That toy will not do its special trick anymore, but we can often still play with it.

Same for the prior state of the universe; it had an ability that was just a tad more than what we have today. We don't know what that ability was, and we actually do not need to know what it was except that it could have done something that is not possible in today's universe anymore. Something broke.

As such, we can say that the secondary level occurred not just because the original and single level birthed a secondary level. Rather, we can say that the original united level stopped being united (broke) and birthed two levels each distinct from one another.

As such, we have the non-materialized level and we have the materialized level, each of a secondary nature since the primary level is no more.

When taking a closer look at matter, then the atoms show us two different levels for matter as well.

Neutrons and protons are linear matter. In my words, they are the damaged original energy, having fully lost its special characteristic and now floating through space in linear fashion only.

The (negative) electrons are the reactions to the (positive) protons and their behavior is non-linear. They still exhibit some of the original trick, but they must perform that in the linear reality in which they are captured.

Had there been twice as many protons, there would have been twice as many electrons. I consider it impossible for the original state to have become matter fully. Had that occurred, it would have existed 15 minutes tops and then returned to its original state.

The secondary level of non-materialized energy is according to me therefore enormously much larger than what got damaged.

Still, and I'll end this here, the idea that anything is unified at the universal level must be rejected, so even the non-materialized energy is not fully connected at the universal level either.

In effect, that means that the Milky Way is not only the largest setting in which we ourselves partake, but that this is also the largest setting for the remaining immaterial energy that involve ourselves.

There is a tiny bit of data to support that. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation apparently is more visible/stronger to observe when looking at other galaxies. If that is true, then the CMBR may be the cocoon of invisible energy that surrounds us, and the radiation the footprint of the tear that occurred some 13.8 billion years ago. The CMBR would then be the signals of that ancient tearing apart of energy that we otherwise cannot see.

This is the Big Whisper theory. It received a handful of peer reviews, indicating it is scientifically speaking possible. It has not received any public attention yet.

--

--

Fred-Rick
Fred-Rick

No responses yet