Fred-Rick
1 min readDec 28, 2023

--

Interesting, Nandan, because my model requires two (new) positions that cannot exist in the original framework, and so the framework was changed by force.

When I see a broken toy on the floor in a room, I know two things:

1. The toy is in tatters, but nothing of the toy disappeared.

2. The special trick the toy was capable of is gone forever.

What this shows is that the original state of the universe's energy had an ability, now gone. That ability led to the final stage of the prior state as well. The toy drove itself off a cliff, so to speak.

As such, a two-staged process is proposed, with the second stage the outbound motion most agree on.

The first stage is then the opposite, a collective inward motion.

Inward motions, when not stopped, end up stopping themselves through damage to parts (not the whole).

Thank you, Nandan.

About anti-matter, this is an incorrect term. It should be mirror-matter because it is still matter. It is found in smaller quantities, a bit like the surf showing us many (normal-matter) waves, and the undertow dragging all that wave-action back to sea containing the (mirror-matter) waves.

Just 4% of all energy is considered to be matter. Mirror-matter is a very small part of that expression of energy.

The ocean is the 96% of energy not expressed in matter (normal or mirror-matter).

--

--

Fred-Rick
Fred-Rick

No responses yet