It is a Black Eye model, and it is competing with the Black Hole model.

A force is always invisible, so when we examine the results produced by that force, then there are two ways to explain it, two models. Still, just one will ultimately be correct.

1. Invisible mass explains the gravitational monster which is then based on that invisible matter. Or...

2. All masses are pulling on the center, creating the gravitation monster, which is then an enormous gravitational depression.

Like the Eye of the Storm we then have a net-zero position in the exact middle.

Yet the Wall of the Eye of the Storm is then the gravitational monster, sitting right next to the net-zero Eye.

--

I don't care how the world is put together. I see the current communications, and I noticed that one model is embraced by everyone and that the other model is ignored by everyone.

I'm just speaking up, trying to shake folks awake that they should deal with two models until they have the actual data to declare which model is correct. Now, we do not have that data.

Compare this to the Eye of the Storm. The force in question is then the wind force, which delivers us two models here as well, but here we have the actual data to declare which one is real and which one is fake.

Every person saying that an Eye of the Storm contains an invisible mass, controlling the storm, will be laughed at because we know that there is no such invisible mass at all.

I am putting my two cents (plus my reputation as a structural philosopher) on the Black Eye model, because it is a laughable idea to suggest that matter in the center of a galaxy can go invisible, can go beyond a horizon, making something that is actual matter become invisible to us.

Thank you for your response. I appreciate it.