It is strange how scientists have all the details and then cannot put all data together. Gödel explained the larger setup really well already, but many scientists reject his view as not applicable to science: Incompleteness Theorems are being put to the side and remain misunderstood by most physicists.
Gödel:
* Matter is convergent at the local level of planet and star.
* Matter is divergent at the universal level
So, we have our 0 and we have our 1. Those are excellent building blocks to explain our material universe.
We can declare the prior state as 1, and then introduce fundamental separation as 0 occurring in (and ending) the prior state. Then, we end up with a material result in which we can recognize the binary system with two overall positions declaring themselves 1 and giving the other position a value of 0.
Convergence (1), divergence (0)
Convergence (0), divergence (1)
My addition to the two states:
* The in-between state of both is seen with solar systems and galaxies, where neither behavior wins out. At these in-between stages, the celestial masses will not become one nor will they fly apart.
The same can be said about QM and GR and their relationship.
QM (0), GR (1)
QM (1), GR (0)
In ordinary words:
* Roll a die once and we have uncertainty what the outcome will be.
* Roll a die one million times and we have certainty that 3 will get thrown one-sixth of the time.
Let’s connect the dots for the forces:
Strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, electromagnetic force, gravitational force.
It is truly not that difficult to see that three are together the fourth. Some consider gravity a force, some do not.
Red, blue, yellow, gray. Mix red, blue and yellow paint and we end up with gray. Some consider gray a color, some do not.
Mothers, fathers, children, families. Families are already there when we have the other three groupings. Some would say that only the families are groups while the first three are not groups.
Synergy, having an intrinsic distinct reality occurring, is only possible when parts smoothly establish that overall outcome that is different from the parts. There is no conflict when the whole is more than the parts, and yet there is also nothing but the parts.
Gravity is also the only force that contains a center in which there is no gravity.
---
There is mathematical evidence that 0 is truly the first step of the material universe (and of any overall perspective). But most physicists have a hard time grasping how zero matter can be the first step toward matter. Feynman understood the importance of space, and yet he could not see that space is prime and matter is second, occurring at the same time and not being the same thing.
I believe that many are agreeing for ages already that matter is a result. Yet no one came to see that the prior reality was then indeed capable of producing matter and that this prior position of 0 matter must then also be seen as an actual scientific position.
Just like Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems, scientists reject everything that is itself not factual. And that is truly not smart of these otherwise extremely smart people. An empty wallet is one of the strongest forces on our planet.
How can physicists examine matter as if that can tell them where matter originated from? It is like examining a baby to figure out how it could have come into this world. It would be smart to ask the parents, but they rather throw that idea out with the bathwater. This is very peculiar behavior that makes very little sense. Scientists say one thing all agree on and then none of them moves forward with it.
Matter being a result means that all perfect and good data about the deeper levels of matter are actually not the most insightful parts to understand where matter came from. Examining the liver or the spleen of the baby is not going to declare where the baby came from. Matter is a result, not the origin.
As such, we end up with too much data in the theories. Scientists know that water boils at 100 degrees Celsius, and it is like they are demanding that this is part and parcel of explaining the thawing of permafrost. These very smart people are not capable of getting right what is extremely simple. It is too simple for their brains.
Newton would have already approved the idea that, based on matter moving outwardly at the universal level, that an inward motion that did not stop by itself preceded that known action. This inward motion means that scientists can look for the reason why or at least how the prior state of the universe ended (and then subsequently produced matter).
The Big Whisper is just one of the theories that gives an explanation why the prior state of the universe ended, and deals for a good amount with the how as well.
Two realities
The prior state of the universe produced matter, but did so from parts of it, not from all. So matter occurs at a 'secondary level' coexisting next to the remnant of the original energy (also floating outwardly in pieces).
Neutrons and protons can then be recognized as damaged original energy (the quarks are the damaged parts), and electrons are the automatic neutralizing agents from the remnants of the original state of the universe to counter the positive charge of the protons. Even at the atomic level we see two realities, not just one. Matter came into being via two distinct pathways, from one and the same source, and from what was obviously an accident. It occurred at the end of the prior state. It did not happen inside the material universe.
The material universe came into being because of the occurrence of a fundamental separation at the end of the prior state of the universe. Matter does not contain the answer how matter came to be. At the same time, the storyline how the prior state ended must be in line with the information we find in our current universe.
—
Good job, Sunnylabh. You are a good writer, and I think you are going to make it far.
