Just to make it absolutely clear what the topic of my article is, R.Hassan, I will say this as clearly as possible:
The human brain accepts a word for the largest of levels that is non-functional in essence, and then the human brain can incorrectly apply a function to it nevertheless.
I see you do that, too. Allow me to explain in further detail.
The proposal of a Cyclic Universe automatically is about the overall level of everything. So, we know that there is no function to that level available. The fact that it is being pronounced as cyclic shows that the proposal is based on a function.
So, that use of language is incorrect. It is like saying that Black&White produces color. In our minds, we can do that, it's easy. In reality, we cannot do that at all. It is from white that we can distill colors; we cannot do that from Black&White.
The demand on you is therefore to use your brain correctly and to avoid fallacies. You cannot talks about the universe and then saying that it is cyclic. You must talk about the details instead.
--
You must talk about energy and then saying that energy had a starting point and after x-number of years that energy returns to that starting point.
Then, you need to show evidence that this is indeed happening.
And that is what I see you cannot show because there is no such information about energy available. I see your feet hanging in the air.
Make sure to have your feet stand on matter or on energy.
Do not have your feet stand on words because words do not have any meaning except the meaning we provide them.
Do not have your feet stand on space or on spacetime. Physicists love to turn space (black) into something (a color), and make space and matter of one and the same thing (black&white is colorful).
Other people use smoke and mirrors. Don't repeat their smoke and mirrors. Do not have your feet stand on other people's smoke and mirrors.
--
Okay, those were the strong words that I had to use to show you my position. If you do not agree with my position, then that is fine. No worries at all. You are the master of your own universe and you must walk your path toward where you want to go.
If you believe that a balancing act is the final answer to the universal question you believe is being asked, then you need to follow that balancing act to a good conclusion.
Let me know when you are finishing your paper. I am curious what you end up writing.
Thank you once more, R., for a good conversation. I really appreciate it.
