I made sure to tell you to distinguish between the data and evidence from the field and the data and evidence from the model.

So, if we take two air molecules and their behaviors, then we will never be able to connect their behaviors with the eye of the storm. It will be impossible to make that connection if we focus on what is basically too small to make any inference on. You have to look at the data and evidence from the field, in this case the entire galaxy and its gravitational monster in the center.

We cannot conclude based on Earth and Moon and their gravitational interaction what an entire collective of masses in a galaxy would produce. That is using a planet and a moon to declare what the collective of 10,000,000 stars or more would produce.

Then, we can take Model Adam (the Black Hole model) and say what you are saying. Yet we can also take Model Eve (the Black Eye model) and say what I am saying. Your perspective about where the force would express itself is from the Adam model, it is interpreted data and not the data itself.

Back to the beginning, Aaron. You have to start with the building blocks of the data from the field, and extrapolating as you are doing is not even close to insufficient.

You do agree that there is 0 wind force in the Eye of the Storm and that the 1 of maximum wind force is found right next to it with the Wall, correct? Or are you denying that? Can you confirm that you do see the model?