Fred-Rick
1 min readMar 11, 2023

--

Mathematically, capturing synergistic outcomes correctly can fall outside folks' vision, Rex.

Instead of calculating just bricks, wood, glass and cement, we also need to ‘calculate’ the collective: the house. That means there are two routes that explain the outcome: the parts, and the synergistic outcome of the parts.

Mix red, blue and yellow paint, and a fourth ‘color’ got created: gray. Gray is real and yet one cannot get from yellow to gray, from red to gray or from blue to gray; one has to mix all three parts and then gray is the outcome.

But you give a good reason why folks consider only the Black Hole as correct: They can't see the synergistic outcome as distinct from the parts. Their brains can't walk in two different manners to the same outcome. They believe there is no strong enough collective to the masses of the galaxy to establish a synergistic outcome in the center.

The Black Hole and the Black Eye model both point to the same outcome. The paths are distinct; the views are different; the outcome is simply the outcome.

Thank you for your reply.

--

--

Fred-Rick
Fred-Rick

Responses (1)