My issue with physicists is that they pick one kind of data/evidence, the so-called small level, and they ignore the data/evidence of the big-picture level.

For instance, when we have a universe full of material result, physicists ignore the fact that this points to an origin that must have ended, it then resulting in dispersed matter and with space then for certain as delineator.

Instead, I see many declare how prior to 13.8 billion years, we basically do not know anything. They have their hands full with rather specific results, and yet they deny we can know much about the prior state.

Insult to injury, many make time, space, energy and matter appear at one event, as if there were any scientific data for that. We only have data on the appearance of matter. We do not have data on the appearance of energy, time, or space (many incorrectly consider Spacetime the reason space and time appeared when matter first appeared).

Next to the Big Bang model, I present them the Big Whisper model (very similar yet distinct), and there are hardly any folks that can discuss the alternate model. Their brains are so fortified with the idea that the Big Bang model is correct in all its specific aspects that they cannot even discuss alternate specific aspects, let alone a model that is mechanically more correct than the Big Bang model.

I see a wall inside the physicists' brains thinking they must be more correct than anyone else who has not achieved the highest level of appreciation by the scientific community. Basically, the Wizards of Oz keep all Dorothies out, not wanting to acknowledge how they are hiding behind a scientific curtain themselves.

I need help breaching the scientific castle. I need smarter brains on the inside of the castle. Right now, foot soldiers are keeping the folks out that want to bring in different approaches.