No issues here, Alexandre.

The beef I have with you is that you take the information of a tool/framework and raise it up to the level that it is identical to reality.

At no point should a person of intelligence mistake the scientific approach the same as the ordinary realistic approach.

The scientific approach is based on the artificial input provided by instruments.

The scientific approach never has any space for the personal input.

"I drove 70 on the freeway" is easy to understand, but it is not scientific.

"The car reached a speed of 70 mph" is equally easy to understand, and this time it is scientific.

There is no "I" in science. Science is always artificially limited to get the personal view out of the picture.

The scientific approach closes one eye, so all data will be the same for all people when they close an eye.

Last: The Scientific Realm (if it tries to capture all) will always be hampered by the Scientific Reach never (ever) capable of achieving the final step of conquering the Scientific Realm.

Everyone knows this; everyone should be aware of this at all times (but some physicists get so enthralled in their specific data that they end up in a rabbit hole thinking it is the entire reality, ending up with proclaiming things that are true only inside their rabbit holes).