No, you are not losing me. I hear what you are saying.

But I rather believe my own eyes than your description, Robert.

Google: "Argentina plena luna" and look under 'images'. Then, find pictures with Spanish texts. I noticed that some pictures with English text are not from there, but from here.

Look at that moon. It is the same moon we see from all over the world. But... the position we look at it is distinctly different from the images you find with "Long Beach full moon".

Do compare both sets of images of the full moon. You can see that the angle is distinctly different.

The feet of the viewer are on land that is curved differently in Buenos Aires than in Long Beach.

So, you have to come up with better data than what you presented.

The earth is not curved fully identical everywhere on the planet. In fact, Mount Everest is only the highest peak when measured from sea level. The sea level in front of the South American coast near the equator is bulging higher than in the Indian Ocean. Had there been no water on our planet, then a not well known mountain in the Andes is the thing that sticks out into space the most.

I want to reply what I said before. I have no problems with critical people. I actually love them. But being critical must be applied to oneself, too, Robert.

Nobody has to be perfect, and in fact when talking together about situations people have more knowledge than when a single person only talks with him or herself about that situation.

I want you to explain how I can view the full moon in South America turned a whole lot of degrees compared to my view in California [it looks like about 60 degrees difference]. You must provide a reasonable explanation to support your idea that the earth is flat otherwise -- with respect -- your reasoning is the only part that is flat.