Not a reply with much contents, Cliff.

Models are models, so you either undermine the model or you support the idea that someone promotes a model you had not conjured yourself.

Is it so difficult to understand that a model can be simpler than the prevailing model?

The Black Hole model is about gravity, an invisible force. Yet it contains subsequently the fantastic aspect that matter can collapse onto itself, then also becoming invisible to our scientific instruments. That is two distinct invisible realities.

The Black Eye model is far simpler. The only invisible part to accept is that gravity is at work here under special conditions; the synergistic outcome in the center is not built on something added; every part that contributed to the synergistic outcome is already present. That's it. There is nothing special in the Black Eye model; everything is readily visible by our scientific instruments, other than gravity itself.

I do not mind negative comments, but do provide contents to your remark that can be considered to the point. Give me something to chew on about the model, and you won't regret it.