I am feeling good that no one undermined the model, David.
Once you see that the model does not need to be proven (but cannot have flaws either of course), we can look for the details.
A: The fastest speed all matter in a galaxy is involved in is the speed away from the original catapulting moment, 13.8 billion years ago. When matter came into being (note that I do not write when energy came into being because we do not have any data when energy came into being, only matter is known), it got thrown outwardly with a speed that did not subside. This is still the fastest speed.
Only that matter that was moving into the same direction remained in that collective, while the tiniest movements away from that collective trajectory would have started up the spinning momentum. Other causes for spinning can be suggested, but the fastest speed we are involved in is that singular direction for the entire collective we call today our Milky Way. Smaller galaxies may have joined, some parts may have gone their own way, but today's Milky Way is a collective, spinning, going into a singular direction.
So, we do have our laundry machine. That singular direction (add in the tiniest amount of gravity) and we have a outer situation that functions like a wall for most of this material collective.
--
The circular motion of the spin is also a collective motion, and in specific spots we can distinguish specific localized forces; they do not undermine the overall setting.
The little wind gusts in the hurricane may go in opposite direction compared to the overall hurricane, but they do not undermine the overall setting.
--
Magnetic fields radiating from central places are still based on matter. All forces are ultimately based on matter, so we have the same question:
Which model are we using for our calculations?
Do we make use of a central invisible mass beyond a horizon to explain the magnetic field outcomes of the central places, or do we make use of a collective reality that exists among all these masses?
--
To discuss one model, we must ensure we do not mix up the understanding of the other model. The hardest part to understand is the fundamental difference between the singular nature of the invisible mass in the center and the synergistic nature of the collective of masses in the center.
Once that is understood, then we can look for all outcomes we actually are aware about and explain them per each model.
For instance, when a truck is lifted up by the Wall of the Eye of the Hurricane, then there are three options what happens with the truck. It can get thrown outwardly, away with the pull of the wind force and that would be a singular line for that truck: picked up and thrown away.
The second option is for that truck to be lifted up and then dragged along with the circular motion of the Wall. So, that is more complex behavior already. Picked up, dragged along a circular motion and then dropped in a particular direction.
The third option is for that truck to end up on the inside of the Wall of the Eye of the Hurricane. For instance, the truck is lifted up, dragged a bit and then dropped from great height, for instance, into the Eye. The Eye itself has no wind force in it, so the truck simply drops.
Envision the Black Eye and a planet entering the Eye, beyond the Wall of the Eye. While there is no gravitational force associated with the Eye itself (the monster is the Wall and not the Eye), the planet will be thrown around in that Eye like a toy. It can remain inside the Wall of the Eye, occasionally touching the Wall and getting an additional push, an additional pull, an additional slap. the planet will end up falling apart; it will end up being dust and dirt. These pieces of the planet will end up being thrown back into the galactic disk (and therefore not very visible) or they will get spewed out via the two perpendicular vents, the only spots that are not under the influence of the galactic disk (because of the net-zero nature of the exact central alignment found on both sides of the exact center).
This is long enough of a reply, but I hope you see that there is actually a variety of answers possible in this collective environment precisely in and around the center of a galaxy.
The hardest part to understand may be the extreme duality of the center. First we have net-zero (0) in the exact center and then, second, we have the most extreme gravitational force (1) right next to it.
I have lots more, David. Just let me know what you desire, but make sure it is all about the distinct Black Eye model. I cannot prove that my Eve is different from your Adam when you want me to undermine the invisible mustache. I present a different model, and the actual data will indeed always fit (some will have to be confirmed by others, I cannot do all the work).
Thank you, sir, for your good reply.
