So, wouldn't it be great to beat them at that game?

I am part of the Local Revolutions grassroots organization, and we found a legal pathway in the US Constitution that forces local governments to replace their discriminating voting systems with the very best system in the world.

Right now, actual voters are being discriminated against, systemically, systematically, by a voting format that is unconstitutional at the local level.

We have sent out 120 Constitutional Invocations so far, just Step 1 of the plan, and we're giving cities and counties one full election cycle to adjust their voting system in place.

Step 2 is getting into the legal area, and we are not there yet. But I have personal experience that governments do sometimes adjust themselves beforehand when they see how much money they may end up paying when they do not adjust themselves right now.

Today, the UK and the USA have very discriminating voting systems in place. Winners are taking all, pushing other people deeper into the mud than they should or are allowed.

Unfortunately, it is allowed at the Federal level and the real benefit is that this helps the nation stay together.

It is not allowed at the State levels, however, and it is not allowed at the local level either. To put it in place, however, is easiest at the local level. A perfect start.

If you have to choose between three rounds of divide-and-conquer or two rounds of divide-and-conquer plus one round of fair elections, which one would you pick, Judith?

There is a line in the sand expressed in the US Constitution, and the States have crossed it. We can get a lot of money from them if they don't change their behavior.

If interested, we can talk more.

'Democracy is always full color. In the United States, it is Red and Blue.'

https://fred-rick.medium.com/democracy-is-always-full-color-532cad433ed9