Thank you, Aaron. Your arguments seem to be very much in favor of the Black Eye model, but you communicate them to me as if they undermine the Black Eye model. That means we are on the right track.
--
I looked it up, the barometric pressure is set at 26.6 inHg inside the Eye of the Storm.
Ordinarily, at 29.8 inHg, we declare we have a low, with air rising, the mass of air rotating counter clockwise. At 30.2 inHg, we have a high, with air sinking, the mass of air rotating clockwise.
It is with these two normal low and high numbers that we can see how extremely low the depression is inside the Eye of the Storm.
While we do have a low that is extreme, there is no extreme high equivalent. It is only in the low direction that we can find this one extreme outcome.
That confirms that we cannot simply point to the Coriolis Force, because had that been the sole source, then we would have seen a low and a high that are comparable in distance to whatever the average is. Instead, we have an extreme in one direction only.
Part of the explanation is that we have just one planet Earth here, and not multiple masses as in a galaxy. We do not have an additional mass across the Eye of the Storm, pulling on this side from across the Eye. So, we are working just with a single material force, underneath the Storm.
Earth is not the only aspect of what ultimately makes us experience wind force because wind force is also made stronger due to the energy being fed to the storm. Feeding it can only end up with one kind of result (the extreme low) and not both kinds of results.
--
For sure, we do not have an inward pull for the Eye of the Storm because there is no additional mass doing that pulling.
Yet we can state that the Black Eye model can be expressed with having an inward pull -- across the center. It is just that the inward pull across the center is much lower than the outward pull due to all masses in a galaxy.
Multiple masses in a galaxy means that we can have the greatest exertion of force in the Black Eye + we have net-zero in the center as well.
We can describe it without the pull across the center, Aaron, but I am trying to help you see how the Black Eye model is truly complex, not simple like the Black Hole model.
The gravitational pull in the center is the maximum point of gravity in the galaxy. Plus it is net-zero. Two parts that we must view separately and not as one and the same thing. Gravity is maximized and it is net-zero in its exact center.
--
No truck is lifted up by the Eye. A truck is lifted up by the Wall of the Eye.
Notice that the truck is not just pulled outwardly but sideways as well. So, we have outward pull + expressed torque because the force is expressed in two distinct manners. The Wall is definitively moving sideways.
--
With gravity, we know that we need to accept a complex process when there are many different masses in play. Their gravitational force is pulling in all directions.
--
On planet Earth, we can check out the circumstance up close.
We cannot check the inside of a Black Hole/Black Eye for ourselves. Hence, we have two models to work with that will disagree with one another in specifics.
Since the force is invisible, there is a variety of ways to make the Black Eye model obvious. You seem to be very close already. I hope you see it.
If you can, please try to undermine the Black Eye model with solid scientific information. So far, you have not provided that information.
