Thank you, Burton, for your reply. I like honesty, because that allows me to read your brain in this respect.

I write in such a manner that you can read my brain, and obviously we disagree on what is going on.

It appears you believe that unification is scientifically possible.

I know it to be impossible, a brain fart.

Consider the broken toy:

1. Everything of the toy is still there (no energy was lost), but the toy is in tatters.

2. The special trick the toy was capable of performing is now gone, for ever.

From this, one gets a different model than the Lambda-CDM model. In the Lambda-CDM model, the idea that unification is possible is retained.

In reality, the scientific data is 'just' that matter came into being, and there is no scientific data at all that time, space, or energy came into being at the same time. We should not be melding scientific data with aspects for which there is no scientific data at all.

Instead, the Big Bang is that moment in time when the prior state of the universe transformed (parts of) its energy into matter to form the current universe. There is no unification, since the original state broke at a fundamental level.

So, I wrote about a different model than the one you are probably accustomed to. I may force you to think anew therefore, and if you cannot do that, then you will likely consider my writing the same as word salad.

Still, I agree that I may not be the best writer, so I do depend on you being able to wrap your mind around my words to see the very important point I am making.

--

Einstein used an additional framework, Spacetime, to explain anomalies seen among the behaviors of matter moving through space.

Gödel was able to replicate this with the same accuracy as Einstein's Spacetime but this time with a space-rotating system. Both systems are correct onto themselves.

Both men (friends in real life) were super-smart, but they both created an artificial framework, not seeing the normal explanation most already agree on today.

The Big Bang established the sent-off push for energy/matter, and we continue to move in that sent-off mode (unless the pathway is interfered/interrupted by another force, of course).

As such, we do have something additional next to Newtonian reality, but it is ordinary. It is not something spectacular like Spacetime or Space-Rotation.

There is an additional motion for matter that is not based on gravity but on the original sent-off, occurring 13.8 billion years ago.

So, a normal explanation is already available. We can throw out Spacetime and Space-Rotation, though they are correct as calculation framework.

That is it, Burton. The article is about the human brain being involved in a brain fart. I hope you will capture it.