Thank you, Del.

The problem with science is that one must often work in an area that is very specialized. One makes use of instruments often as well.

What I am trying to say is that we end up in a specialist zone, so the reality we work with slowly becomes a tiny bit more 2D instead of 3D, if you get the drift.

Let me use one example, about the search to unify all forces.

* weak-nuclear force

* strong-nuclear force

* electromagnetic force

* gravitational force

To find out how they relate, physicists are looking for an answer as if all will be found on a flat piece of paper, i.e. a 2D approach.

See for yourself if you can see the relationships among the following four entities (which can be declared human forces):

* fathers

* mothers

* children

* families

What should be noticed is how simple the connections are when dealing with these ordinary examples about humans and their relationships.

You can tell that there are four groups but one group contains the people of the other three groups. So, from three we have four.

That is the synergistic effect, meaning we get something that behaves in completely different manners and yet nothing extra was added.

Envision yourself under the power of a father, a mother, of children, and of a family as a whole. Each power should be seen as distinct, recognizable as unique like a mother bear fighting for her cubs, attacking anyone getting close.

Via this method it becomes far easier to look for the unifying setup among the four forces as presented at first.

Gravity is then the synergistic outcome of the other forces and not something new itself.

By approaching relationships this way, and by trying to find real-life structures, the natural sciences such as physics can be understood more quickly.

Unfortunately, physicists desire that all is expressed in their specific language first, and that makes it very difficult to communicate well with them. For me it was only after communicating years and years via sites, such as Quora, Medium, and others, that I learned how to communicate with them properly. And even then it is complex.

As I see it, physicists must close one eye to look through the microscope. With one eye, all views can be compared easily. Yet once we have both eyes open, then the problems arise. Discussing depth is not the forte of most physicists, but I can also not tell them that. It is like discussing a specific red or green outcome to someone who is colorblind and does not know it.

Thank you for your kind reply. I appreciate it.