Thank you, Dylan, for your reply. Let me give you the scientific storyline so you can follow what I am saying.
If we start out with the scientific question if there can possibly be a unified field of forces, then the answer to that question is definitively NO.
There can be (two) fields of forces indeed, but there cannot be a unified field of forces. We can place the four specific forces on one level (as done with the GUT), and we must place gravity on its own level.
—
To show that structurally first, I will use what Gödel already provided us:
When asking What the Whole is and then demanding the answer is discussed in a specific format (in this case, physics), then we will always end up in with incompleteness as answer (meaning the answer to the question is NO).
Allow me to simplify this so everyone reading this reply can follow this.
When desiring to understand human nature (the whole of it), and then demanding that only males are used as subject matter, then the answer will always show an incompleteness, even when much can point to an overall truth (for human beings, and for males). We then failed to start the conversation at the absolute correct level because we established conditions first. That is a faux pas.
Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems are not well-understood by most physicists, and they actually and actively push them to the side. They declare them outside Physics, not applicable to Physics.
Economists on the other hand follow Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems just fine.
—
The Theory about the Whole is in its best version a pyramid: Four corners and a pointy top above.
- Weak Nuclear Force
- Strong Nuclear Force
- Electric Force
- Magnetic Force
These four forces are found specifically with matter and have been unified in the Grand Unified Theory
- Gravity
This force is seen as the overall force, which indeed it actually is. It is associated with matter, but it is harder to spot-point it.
The surprise is that the four specific forces combined are the gravitational force.
Again, translated for non-scientists so they can follow this, too, the human forces are:
- Paternal Force
- Maternal Force
- Girl Power
- Boy Power
- Familial Force
Of these five forces, four have a center spot taken in by an individual, while the fifth force is not based on an individual.
No single person can be a family. Family Force implies pressure from at least two members, otherwise it would not be a Family Force.
Gödel already gave us these answers 100 years ago. He may not have understood the full scale of what he delivered (he was just looking at structure, playing with structural thought if you wish, and discovered his first Incompleteness Theorem and then ‘played’ a little more to find the second Incompleteness Theorem).
His first theorem in a simplified example:
Start with either just males or just females only, and you can never come to a full overall conclusion about a unified human nature.
His second theorem as follow-up:
Start with both males and females as examples, and you can still never come to a full overall conclusion about a unified human nature.
In plain examples.
1/ The truth about males does not always apply to females.
2/ The truth about females does not always apply to males.
3/ The truth about males and females require us to place the fig leaves on Adam and Eve for some parts can simply not be made the same.
-The first two show examples of Gödel’s first Incompleteness Theorem.
-The third shows an example of Gödel’s second Incompleteness Theorem.
Scientists wondering out loud about a Unified Field of Forces tell us right away that they did not pay attention in the Structural Thinking class (they may have skipped that class altogether).
Again in plain language: They want God to have a single eye, and that can never be the case if we want to be created in God’s image.
A Unified Field of Forces is scientists telling us they do not understand the Big Picture. A Unified Field of Forces is denying we live in a result.
Thank you, Dylan, for replying. Let me know if you have any further questions.
