Thank you for putting a smile on my face. I appreciate it.

Allow me (but you may see how I stand in all this already) to make the point one last time, Ian.

My feet are either based on matter or on energy.

I am not like physicists who stand on space or spacetime. I reject that as illogical, but there is an interesting story to tell about Einstein.

When Einstein worked on his theories and birthed Spacetime, he actually had not heard about the Big Bang.

That means his theories did not incorporate the most important motion of matter.

Meanwhile, his Spacetime is based on the behavior of matter. His attraction was particularly focused on the anomalies, for instance, Mercury's perihelion.

So, we can end up declaring Einstein correct, but only as having delivered us the framework to calculate the behavior of matter in either a star system setting or a galaxy setting. His framework is simply put based on gravity, whereas the behavior of matter is particularly based on the original push established in the Big Bang.

An object at rest remains at rest, or if in motion, remains in motion at a constant velocity unless acted on by a net external force.

So, the Big Bang event occurred with a Force spending itself, like a catapult spending itself on flying a stone through the air.

The Milky Way is not from the center of the materialization process. It is from Zone 2, probably not too far away from where the CMBR took place.

1. Original state under normal circumstances caused itself to end up in:

2. Extreme pressure that caused some energy to become deformed into a quark soup, which caused:

3. The revert the circumstances that caused the extreme pressure, and once that had succeeded, we are with:

4. The CMBR when the conditions are finally back to normal, yet the quarks would never return to their original state and as such we have:

5. The immediate formation of neutrons and protons at first opportunity (when pressure had subsided enough) and the positive charge of the proton caused:

6. The electrons to be pulled in from non-damaged energy (also catapulting outwardly) to neutralize the positive charge, but not annihilating it.

That means we have two realities, charge-wise:

Sub-atomically we have a charge.

At the universal level, there is no charge.

Spacetime can be declared as framework, but only for the behavior of matter, and only for star or galactic system. It cannot be applied to the universe (it would be nonsensical).

Thank you for challenging me a bit. I appreciate it.

Keep those feet where you want them, Ian. I'll keep mine on matter or on energy.