Thank you for some good critique, MH. I appreciate it.
The nature of the decimal system is that it automatically presents us shortcuts. When writing 2, we can immediately envision that as two parts, for instance, opposing one another. If I am not mistaken, then in ancients times Two was even the name of the God of War (naturally, it was Two in that ancient language, not in English). A logical aspect is captured with the decimal system, but it also focuses us on the shortcuts.
In the binary system, we can do anything the decimal system can also do. Yet we have to create many outcomes first. The natural state of the binary system is therefore 'naked' if you allow me to use that word. We have to create Unity in the binary system, for instance, with appointing 11100100 that specific meaning and then also through agreeing on it.
That is the entire point I am trying to make. As long as we view the universe through the eyes of the decimal system, we may actually 'force' ourselves to view the universe in a specific manner, due to the incorporation of these handy shortcuts.
By viewing the universe through the lens of the binary system, we liberate ourselves from these handy shortcuts, and we then have a clean vision on the universe.
-
God is an unnatural aspect if we make God one among everything there is.
For instance, if we take the commonly used assignment of God being Almighty, then we can see that we are operating in fantasy land. The word All can be replaced with 1, whereas Mighty (or mightiest) can be replaced with 1st. It is not possible to combine 1 and 1st in a word and then have that word be constructed logically. It is not possible, though we can assign the word in totality to have a specific meaning, and then all agreeing on that meaning.
Understanding the universe then automatically means understanding how our brains are doing their work. It turns out that there are natural positions and there are artificial positions. The strength of the artificial positions occurs when there are benefits associated with them. We accept them readily when there is a benefit for it.
Good examples of artificial realities are money (currencies), languages, and religions. Using the same currency is much handier than using all different kinds of manner to pay for stuff. Yet an aspect derives then with currencies competing with one another, seeing one currency as strong and the other currency as weak. Strangely, this is a natural outcome of an artificial reality.
Same for religion, with competition going on among them, from a single God to many Gods to no God, and there is even a pagan religion with just two Gods.
Each of these religious structures are not identical in their mathematical appearances. They are distinct, and one can recognize 0, 1, 2, and several larger numbers among all religions in the world. Which one to pick is up to us ourselves, or sit back and enjoy the variety that people conjured in their minds while thinking about the divine realm.
The beauty is that we can call out the 1 construct as artificial. There is nothing natural about 1 in the meaning of All 1. It does not exist.
So, we disagree (which is fine) about the underlying structure of the binary and the decimal system. Unfortunately, it means that the point I am making will then not make too much sense to you. You are not seeing the (fine) point I am making. This may be due to my lousy writing or to the complications of needing to use language in an extremely refined manner to make a certain point come across.
I do appreciate your reply, and I like reading how you are envisioning this (as nonsense). Perhaps describing it as I have here will make you see the fine point. If not, then I still appreciate your having taken the time to delve in.
