Thank you for this reply, Amrit. I am taking your reply as the means to move our communication further. With this real good reply, you are following a single ‘roadway’ presenting things as if this is indeed how things are.
However, the real truth is that set theorists (a group found among mathematicians) is a small group that declares zero to be a natural number [yes, I do agree with them].
Next to them, number theorists (representing the largest group of mathematicians and indeed most scientists) declare zero to not be a natural number.
— -
Okay, let’s incorporate a pause here. Because the issue is not which position is which, or which position is right, but that both options are present in our reality.
Our scientific community behaves like a Rubin’s Vase, with one group declaring they can see very clearly a vase in the picture (representing unity or unification). Meanwhile, the other group (generally a much smaller group, though many people take this position when it benefits them to create opposition to what is being proposed) says ‘not so fast’. They say that there are oppositional forces at play, because clearly there are two faces, and there is no vase.
I want to command you for your very excellent views, and I like all of your replies, Amrit. But I want to ask you to stand at that exact juxtaposition where all truths have their place at the same time, conflicting as they are in their own essence.
The Rubin’s Vase declares not that there are two realities, but rather that from one position the other option is nothing but a background feature, while from the other position the background is taken in by the first.
I hope you recognize something I say loud and clear in the following article, which is that separation in our universe is prime. Matter is self-based, and not universal.
Can you follow me in declaring the truth in two distinct ways like a Rubin’s Vase (which is a two-dimensional reality) in our minds (which I claim is a two-dimensional reality, too) about our three-dimensional universe?
That is the crux of the matter as I see it: if we do not recognize the structure of our thinking, we cannot recognize the structure of the universe.
Looking forward to your reply.
