Thank you once again for your reply to my original article, Bhupinder. I saw where you were going but you held on to the original model instead of seeing its inverse.
More came out recently:
Recently, Roy Kerr came out with the notion that Black Holes do not need a singularity within them.
The story becomes closer and closer to what I claim: The Black Hole is 'just' a phenomenon. There is no matter there.
Interesting detail is that I communicated with family member Rex Kerr on this long before Roy Kerr wrote his article.
Just saying... when people don't pay attention to the data but focus on the model being absolutely correct, then they can end up wagging the dog. The inverse is then overlooked.
Thank you, sir.
