Thank you, Thomas, for your further communication.
When investigating the largest of structure possible, then it should all become clear. Here is the simple pathway to see what I am talking about in a quick and easy exercise.
Write your name on an envelope, your address, city, country, planet Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, Universe, and hand the letter to the postal person.
The postal person will deliver the letter to the right person, in this case that is you, but mentions that of the 8 items on the envelope only 7 items provided direction.
The word Universe did not provide the postal person any direction.
The reason is that the word Universe is not a unit, but rather a collective of parts that do not all agree with one another.
Matter is, for instance, always finite.
Space is always infinite.
So, we have a word, Universe, and it appears to be singular, but it is in reality only a name tag to cover all that is seen and unseen in our reality.
We can double check this with understanding that there are no small universal units that collectively make up the universe. So, it is not like a group that has members, and all members make up the group. Rather, it is somewhat like Life which is not based on a single kind, but encompasses everything that is alive.
With Life, we have only entities that are alive. With Universe, we have everything, alive and non-alive alike.
--
So, the largest of levels is structurally itself not an entity. It is not based on a single setting, but on the very complex setting of matter, energy, time, and space.
I accept the Big Bang theory as correct in that we do have matter moving apart from one another.
With this, I see the confirmation that the original state of the universe broke apart, starting some 13.8 billion years ago.
This means that it is impossible to declare the broken vase whole. At some point the vase was whole. But now it is broken. That means we cannot come to something that is absolutely complete.
It is exactly the opposite of complete.
Thank you for the good conversation.
