Thanks, Aaron, I like what you write and I love seeing the Klein bottle. Fun.

But it does not declare what I see happening -- at least, not specifically enough.

Matter is two different kinds of energy: linear and non-linear.

The quarks deliver us the linear reality in neutrons and protons. They are found in the nuclei of atoms, and they are self-based (meaning they don't meld into one another but remain neutron and proton).

The protons are charged positively and therefore the negative electrons got pulled into this environment, too.

The electrons are non-linear, they are not self-based, and they are not found in the nuclei of atoms.

We have two closed systems of energy therefore in our universe.

https://fred-rick.medium.com/two-closed-systems-not-one-3d66da5b8dff

The point I am making here is that the electrons are non-linear. They are not based on the linear timeline of the neutrons and protons.

The electrons are therefore not based on our straight timeline all the time.

My claim is that we have to sleep one-third of the day because our electrons need to recover from that strict timeline when awake.

Once we are in that dream state, the electrons recover and our bodies (neutrons, protons, electrons, I don't care which ones) compute the following day. Energy is pulled in from all directions in as far as considered important.

Hence, there is a chance to preview what may happen, but what may happen is not always what will happen.

In as far as the Klein bottle is concerned, the self-based neutrons and protons declare how the ultimate outcome is based on more than what is self-based. That what is other-based influences the outcome and that is not shown with the model.

The Klein bottle works with one closed system. I work with two closed systems.

Still. I like hearing about the Klein bottle. There are some similarities. Yet the non-linear energy communicating at the non-linear level while it must fit in with the linear energy, that is the essence for me how time travel in the mind is possible.