Thanks, Vic, for your kind reply.
Yes, I am actively promoting the idea of proportional elections for the local level. It is amazing how few people understand it; they think it is like our voting system, but we vote for a king or queen in every election (from our city/county district elections to our national elections).
In proportional voting it is like the round table where all voters are represented.
Already with just two seats, there is a substantial difference:
Not only do we pick just red or blue, we are also majority driven in our picking that representative. The minimum people represented in our system is therefore always 50 percent plus one vote, whether there are two seats or eight seats or many more. In Proportional voting that minimum goes up quite quickly.
Almost nine out of ten voters can point their fingers toward the person they personally voted for — that is the minimum number. It is simple: the pie is cut up according to the votes; there is no game.
Politically, we do not think in green, orange or yellow because we cannot express ourselves that way and we actively banish those colors from our thinking. We were had. I call it the duopoly. We’re not like China with one party; we’re like double China. A basic color copier has more colors than our political system.
Here’s an example, Vic, how a place with eight seats on the city council would get their representatives picked using proportional voting:
In the example, four political colors are the more natural outcome, not the truly stupid single color we find throughout the nation today.
Once we experienced proportional voting, we’ll never go back (because our current voting system gives the politicians unnecessary amounts of power).
If we do not organize freedom well, then freedom will go to the top. Single color only!
