That is because I wanted to use the easy route and explain how one should use various structures to come to conclusions.

Your question itself contained a fallacy because you are asking me to “produce faith argumenting scientifically.”

In short, you are mixing up two systems that are based on separate grounds and we cannot do that.

Many people mix up different structures quite easily, actually, because we have a very malleable brain.

When pointed out, for instance, that we should not see numbers in letters or letters in numbers, then a good amount of people sees no problem seeing a 3 in C, a 4 in D, and a 5 in E.

We can see the relationships when things are simple. But the example breaks down when trying to express 27 this way because Z is 26 and there aren't any more letters. These systems are not based on one another. They are self-based. One is limited, the other is not.

Cutting to the chase: The word God is not found in the scientific dictionary.

So, if you ask me to look up God in the scientific dictionary, your question contains a fallacy. You did not realize the word is not in there, but exists in another dictionary.

You can claim to say one dictionary is holier than the other, but I believe that is exactly the position we should try to avoid. Religion and Science should never be mixed in serious conversations. No person should ask a sincere question mixing words from different dictionaries.

So, ask me your question again, but make sure you are asking the question using one framework only and don’t mixed them up.