That's a brain fart. This idea is based in the monotheistic idea. Six thousand years ago, no human being thought there was just a single God, but today we do not live in close harmony with realistic nature anymore. Today, we are embracing the highest levels of the brain more, and sometimes we produce brain farts that way.

Physicists also think there can be a unified field of forces, another brain fart.

--

Gödel showed about 100 years ago that the big picture is automatically an Incompleteness. It does not mean something is missing, but rather that the specific truths (axioms) combined do not add up to a single Completeness.

No person will be male, female, young and old (alive and dead) at the same time. That person does not exist. The single human example will always produce an Incompleteness (despite each individual being complete onto him- or herself).

We can say there is a God, but if we want God to be singular in essence, then we must follow Spinoza ("God is real, but only at the abstract level", or words with the same meaning). We can say that God = Energy. No problem at all.

But to unite all in one divine entity can only mean that we believe that God is a Cyclops, a brain fart. No matter the fact that God is 'just' a word, when we use the term then we also use it in line with ourselves having been created in the image of God. So, God as a Cyclops is out, a brain fart. We are not Cyclopses (but sometimes our brain behaves as if it is a Cyclops).

Adam wasn't first and Eve then second, from parts of Adam.

God has two principles (two eyes), so Adam and Eve were actually created at the same time (per that analogy). Anything else ("Adam first") is a brain fart.