The Big Bang Theory Does Not Agree With Model #3

A child can already see what is improper about the Big Bang theory.

Photo by Ben White on Unsplash

Physicists look for evidence first and worry about the overall model later. In this article, the model is discussed first about how matter could have come into existence. Then, the data is examined (in a cursory manner) in light of the Big Bang theory.

—

The starting point of this quest is the scientific information that Matter came into being some 13.8 billion years ago.

Prior to that point, there was no Matter. What existed prior depends on what model is used.

Instead of looking for specific data, such as with the Large Hadron Collider in which Matter is collided at enormous energy levels, the goal is to focus on the model first.

• It turns out that there are just three models available to us.

The Big Bang theory makes use of either Model #1 or Model #2.

• The Big Bang theory does not make use of Model #3.

Just this modeling fact alone points to a flaw inside many physicists’ minds. If correct, the Big Bang theory should cover all three models (accepting/rejecting them). The Big Bang model is silent about Model #3.

—